JWT and Carat: big firms taking baby steps
April 15th, 2005
Change is afoot in at the big advertising and media buying agencies. JWT , it seems, believes:
Advertising has a future, but only if we stop interrupting what people are interested in and be what people are interested in. We need to create work that people choose to spend time with.
Meanwhile,
Carat
is launching
blog starter kits
for its big name clients. Carat’s vice-president and national media director, John Cate says on
Marketing Vox
:
We want our clients to take part in a productive dialogue with serious, like-minded consumers that will be beneficial to both.
No more interuptions. Conversation. Dialogue. Could it be that the big name agencies are beginning to see the light? Maybe. Maybe not.
You see, if JWT want people to spend time with them, where’s their RSS feed? I take no credit for that question - just go and see James Governor’s latest post on Monkchips . Reminding us of Nick Wreden’s analysis at FusionBrand , James says this:
JWT does have a couple more steps to take in understanding and driving the attention economy from what I can see at a glance, and if you know more about the company’s decision to become more conversational please let me know. Authentic or not?
And what about Carat? Back in February, in the John Cate said:
Ads can cheapen and compromise a blog.
Yet, barely six weeks later, Mr Cate is in Brand Republic , saying:
For advertisers, blogs offer a number opportunities…
It’s good to see the big agencies going in the right direction, but one wonders why they have to make such a meal of it. There is such a contrast between the big agency approach and that of new blogger and regular commenter on 173 Drury Lane, Mark Pinkerton , or that of James and Steve at RedMonk .
Mark’s advice: forget the “blog starter kit,” just get a TypePad subscription. Redmonk offers:
Quick and dirty consultation on how RSS can put [conversational] strategy on steroids.
There, I think, is the problem for the big agencies: conversational marketing tools are light and cheap, they are “quick and dirty.”
The challenge for JWT and Carat et al is going to be making sufficient money out of an approach to marketing which does not, at first sight, fit the big agency mould. Do the big agencies have to rely on the “no-one ever got fired for buying IBM” factor? And will their clients pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for what I created in five minutes with WordPress?
The big agencies have woken up. They are taking baby steps. What are they going to do next?
3 Comments Add your own
1. James Governor | April 15th, 2005 at 11:58 am
a little coda - after writing my blog i went to the JWT contacts page. on it there are two names- one in London and one in NY. both are “new business” contacts. neither of them replied to my email surfacing my blog. so much for conversations and not putting finance first. i must admit i am somewhat disappointed. maybe they just thought it was a sales pitch, but if they are salesmen no bloody wonder. i am going to send a copy of the blogs to “made up” email addresses for the managers on the JWT site, and see if i get a response of any kind. If they dont respond to praise i wonder how they respond to criticism.
2. Nick Wreden | April 15th, 2005 at 3:26 pm
Yes, the big agencies have woken up, but they are going to remain sluggish for a while. Look for the next big move by agencies into RSS feeds. It’s already happening, and will be popular since, in many ways, it replicates the broadcast TV model. And thanks for the link.
Nick
3. Adrian | April 15th, 2005 at 5:50 pm
James, I love that approach. Let us know how it goes.
Nick, you’re welcome to the link, but I don’t think I will be sending much traffic your way!
Sluggish is right. Still, it must be hard work making a big agency change from a broadcast to a dialogue mindset. Like trying to turn a supertanker. And then there are all the clients. Like trying to turn a fleet of supertankers.
The point is I can just about take Lifehacker’s Sony ad/posts - they are infrequent and done with a certain degree of aplomb - but if the Sony ads were more intrusive, I think I would unsubscribe.
Remember advertisers, when I am reading my RSS feeds, please don’t interrupt.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
Trackback this post |